Dimensions of Complexity in Hawaiian Native Cultural Studies Scholarship
Challenging the Notion of a Singular Hawaiian Culture
A pivotal complexity in Hawaiian Native Cultural Studies arises from the heterogenous nature of Hawaiian culture itself. Far from being a monolithic entity, Hawaiian culture encompasses a vast array of regional variations, temporal shifts, and individual expressions (Kato, 2022). The concept of a singular, static Hawaiian culture is an oversimplification that fails to capture the dynamic and multifaceted nature of Hawaiian society throughout history.
Scholars such as Jonathan Osorio (2002) have emphasized the need to recognize the internal diversity within Hawaiian culture. Osorio argues that "the idea of a singular, unified Hawaiian culture is a colonial construct" (p. 12). This notion was imposed upon Hawaiians by Western colonizers who sought to legitimize their conquest by portraying Hawaiian society as primitive and lacking the complexity of Western civilization.
By challenging the monolithic view of Hawaiian culture, Native Hawaiian scholars can reclaim the agency of their ancestors and disrupt colonial narratives. By acknowledging the diversity of Hawaiian cultural practices, beliefs, and values, scholars can provide a more accurate and nuanced understanding of Hawaiian history and society.
Deconstructing Power Relations in Cultural Knowledge Production
Another significant complexity in Hawaiian Native Cultural Studies lies in the power relations inherent in the production of cultural knowledge. Historically, Western scholars have dominated the field of Hawaiian studies, often perpetuating colonial perspectives and marginalizing Native Hawaiian voices (Trask, 1999). This power imbalance has created a situation where the authority to define and interpret Hawaiian culture has been primarily vested in non-Native scholars.
However, in recent decades, Native Hawaiian scholars have challenged this power dynamic by asserting their own voices and perspectives in the field. By reclaiming their cultural heritage and challenging dominant narratives, Native Hawaiian scholars have empowered themselves and created new platforms for the dissemination of Native Hawaiian knowledge.
Indigenous methodologies, which prioritize Native Hawaiian perspectives and cultural protocols, have emerged as powerful tools for decolonizing Hawaiian cultural studies. These methodologies emphasize the importance of community engagement, oral histories, and embodied knowledge, centering the voices and experiences of Native Hawaiians in the production of cultural knowledge (Kauanui, 2016).
Negotiating Biculturalism and Identity Dynamics
Native Hawaiians who live in the contemporary world often navigate complex bicultural and identity dynamics, a further complexity in Hawaiian Native Cultural Studies. Hawaiians have been exposed to Western culture and values since the arrival of European explorers in the late 18th century. As a result, many Native Hawaiians today identify with both Hawaiian and non-Hawaiian cultures, creating a unique blend of traditional and modern influences (Tamura, 2006).
Scholars have examined the challenges and opportunities that arise from this bicultural identity. For some Native Hawaiians, biculturalism provides a bridge between two worlds, allowing them to maintain a strong sense of Hawaiian identity while also engaging with the broader society. However, others may experience a sense of alienation or marginality as they navigate the cultural divide between Hawaiian and non-Hawaiian worlds.
Addressing Issues of Cultural Appropriation and Revitalization
Cultural appropriation is a significant concern in Hawaiian Native Cultural Studies, further complicating the field. Non-Native individuals or organizations often adopt or borrow elements of Hawaiian culture without understanding or respecting their cultural significance. This appropriation can range from the use of hula in fitness classes to the commercialization of Native Hawaiian sacred symbols.
Scholars have condemned cultural appropriation as a form of colonialism that undermines the sovereignty and integrity of Hawaiian culture. They argue that cultural appropriation perpetuates stereotypes and commodifies Native Hawaiian cultural practices, contributing to the erosion of Hawaiian identity.
In response to cultural appropriation, Native Hawaiian communities have embarked on efforts to revitalize and reclaim their culture. They have established cultural centers, language immersion programs, and traditional arts workshops to ensure that Hawaiian cultural traditions are passed down to future generations.
Conclusion: Embracing Complexity and Expanding Perspectives
Hawaiian Native Cultural Studies is a vibrant and multifaceted field that encompasses a wide range of complexities. From challenging the notion of a singular Hawaiian culture to deconstructing power relations in cultural knowledge production, scholars have engaged in critical examinations of the field's foundational concepts and methodologies.
Moreover, the bicultural and identity dynamics of Native Hawaiians, coupled with issues of cultural appropriation and revitalization, further contribute to the complexities of Hawaiian Native Cultural Studies. By exploring these complexities, scholars can deepen our understanding of Hawaiian culture, its history, and its contemporary relevance.
As the field continues to evolve, it is essential to embrace these complexities and expand our perspectives. By centering Native Hawaiian voices and perspectives, employing indigenous methodologies, and engaging in collaborative research endeavors, scholars can contribute to a more inclusive and decolonized understanding of Hawaiian culture. Ultimately, the goal of Hawaiian Native Cultural Studies is to empower Native Hawaiians, preserve their cultural heritage, and foster a greater appreciation for the unique and enduring legacy of the Hawaiian people.
Join the conversation